California · Landlord Retaliation

Landlord Retaliation Laws in California

California § 1942.5 prohibits retaliation for protected tenant activities. Its 180-day rule has conditions; other retaliation protections are not limited to that period.

180-day rule
Subsection a applies after specified events when the tenant is not in rent default and the landlord acts in retaliation.
Other protected activity
Subsection d prohibits retaliation for lawful tenant organizing or lawful, peaceable exercise of rights.
Lawful grounds
Good-faith lawful grounds may still support landlord action; the statute sets proof requirements.
Remedies
Actual damages and, for fraud, oppression or malice, statutory punitive damages may be available.

Guidance for California Landlords

Do not take adverse action because a tenant engaged in protected activity. The 180-day provision is conditional, not an automatic ban on all notices or rent changes. Subsections f and g preserve specified good-faith lawful action and require stated grounds and proof where retaliation is disputed. Immigration threats or reports made in retaliation for protected activity are included in the statute.

Rights and Protections for California Tenants

Keep records of complaints, official inspections, notices and other protected activity. The 180-day rule under subsection a requires that you not be in rent default and concerns specified triggering events. Subsection d separately protects lawful tenant organizing and exercise of rights, with retaliation to be proved by the tenant. A landlord can still establish lawful, nonretaliatory grounds.

The statute
Cal. Civ. Code § 1942.5 — Retaliation by the Lessors Against Lessees
Read the official text ↗
1942.5.   (a) If the lessor retaliates against the lessee because of the exercise by the lessee of the lessee’s rights under this chapter or because of the lessee’s complaint to an appropriate agency as to tenantability of a dwelling, and if the lessee of a dwelling is not in default as to the payment of rent, the lessor may not recover possession of a dwelling in any action or proceeding, cause the lessee to quit involuntarily, increase the rent, or decrease any services within 180 days of any of the following: (1) After the date upon which the lessee, in good faith, has given notice pursuant to Section 1942, has provided notice of a suspected bed bug infestation, or has made an oral complaint to the lessor regarding tenantability. (2) After the date upon which the lessee, in good faith, has filed a written complaint, or an oral complaint which is registered or otherwise recorded in writing, with an appropriate agency, of which the lessor has notice, for the purpose of obtaining correction of a condition relating to tenantability. (3) After the date of an inspection or issuance of a citation, resulting from a complaint described in paragraph (2) of which the lessor did not have notice. (4) After the filing of appropriate documents commencing a judicial or arbitration proceeding involving the issue of tenantability. (5) After entry of judgment or the signing of an arbitration award, if any, when in the judicial proceeding or arbitration the issue of tenantability is determined adversely to the lessor. In each instance, the 180-day period shall run from the latest applicable date referred to in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive. (b) A lessee may not invoke subdivision (a) more than once in any 12-month period. (c) To report, or to threaten to report, the lessee or individuals known to the landlord to be associated with the lessee to immigration authorities is a form of retaliatory conduct prohibited under subdivision (a). This subdivision shall in no way limit the definition of retaliatory conduct prohibited under this section. (d) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), it is unlawful for a lessor to increase rent, decrease services, cause a lessee to quit involuntarily, bring an action to recover possession, or threaten to do any of those acts, for the purpose of retaliating against the lessee because the lessee has lawfully organized or participated in a lessees’ association or an organization advocating lessees’ rights or has lawfully and peaceably exercised any rights under the law. In an action brought by or against the lessee pursuant to this subdivision, the lessee shall bear the burden of producing evidence that the lessor’s conduct was, in fact, retaliatory. (e) To report, or to threaten to report, the lessee or individuals known to the landlord to be associated with the lessee to immigration authorities is a form of retaliatory conduct prohibited under subdivision (d). This subdivision shall in no way limit the definition of retaliatory conduct prohibited under this section. (f) This section does not limit in any way the exercise by the lessor of the lessor’s rights under any lease or agreement or any law pertaining to the hiring of property or the lessor’s right to do any of the acts described in subdivision (a) or (d) for any lawful cause. Any waiver by a lessee of the lessee’s rights under this section is void as contrary to public policy. (g) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, a lessor may recover possession of a dwelling and do any of the other acts described in subdivision (a) within the period or periods prescribed therein, or within subdivision (d), if the notice of termination, rent increase, or other act, and any pleading or statement of issues in an arbitration, if any, states the ground upon which the lessor, in good faith, seeks to recover possession, increase rent, or do any of the other acts described in subdivision (a) or (d). If the statement is controverted, the lessor shall establish its truth at the trial or other hearing. (h) Any lessor or agent of a lessor who violates this section shall be liable to the lessee in a civil action for all of the following: (1) The actual damages sustained by the lessee. (2) Punitive damages in an amount of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each retaliatory act where the lessor or agent has been guilty of fraud, oppression, or malice with respect to that act. (i) In any action brought for damages for retaliatory eviction, the court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party if either party requests attorney’s fees upon the initiation of the action. (j) The remedies provided by this section shall be in addition to any other remedies provided by statutory or decisional law. (k) A lessor does not violate subdivision (c) or (e) by complying with any legal obligation under any federal government program that provides for rent limitations or rental assistance to a qualified tenant. (l) This section shall become operative on October 1, 2021. (Amended (as amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 2, Sec. 6) by Stats. 2021, Ch. 27, Sec. 5. (AB 832) Effective June 28, 2021. Operative October 1, 2021, by its own provisions.)
Common questions
Does protection end after 180 days?
Not necessarily. The 180-day rule concerns subsection a; subsection d separately prohibits retaliation for protected activity.
Does a complaint stop every eviction?
No. Eligibility, motive and lawful grounds matter. The statute preserves good-faith nonretaliatory action.
Are immigration reports covered?
The statute includes immigration reports or threats made in retaliation for protected activity; this is not a statement that every report is retaliation.

Where do you stand in your own case?

Answer a few questions about your California landlord retaliation situation and get an assessment of your position, with relevant sources and next steps.

Begin Free Assessment →

No account required · Takes 5 minutes · Free

Related guides

Important: This page quotes and summarizes statutes for general information. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes are amended; verify against the official source linked above. For advice on your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Sources and summary checked: 2026-09-26